Software projects with well-designed automated tests increase code trust, allowing developers to confidently release code changes. For a software team, automated testing takes 35% more time and effort. However, in the long run, this initial investment pays off in the form of higher-quality code.
Below are some misunderstandings about automated tests.
1. Automated tests can replace manual testing
False. Automated tests are meant to supplement rather than replace manual testing. Automated tests can assist speed up the manual testing process by automating some of the processes, but they can’t replace manual testing entirely. To verify that all functional and non-functional requirements are met, manual testing is still required.
2. Automated tests are expensive and time-consuming to create
False. If automated tests are not well-designed and maintained, they can be costly and time-consuming to develop. Automated tests, on the other hand, can save time and money by discovering errors early in the development process if they are well-designed.
3. Automated tests are brittle and break easily
False. Because automated tests are done on a regular basis, they are more stable than manual testing. Automated tests, when integrated into CI/CD pipelines, can detect defects before they cause system problems.
4. Automated tests are only for GUI-based applications
False. Automated testing may help any application, whether it’s web-based or not. Because web-based systems are more sophisticated and have more possible sources of failure, automated testing is extremely crucial. Just make sure you’re not testing other team members’ code or doing automated technology tests.
5. Automated test are only for large applications
False. Automated testing is even more necessary for smaller applications, because the risk of error is larger and manual testing is more expensive. Automated testing can aid in the early detection of defects and their prevention from becoming an issue in the future.
— -
Photo by Maxim Berg on Unsplash
